Manual Therapy
Volume 17, Issue 1 , Pages 9-21, February 2012

Clinical prediction rules in the physiotherapy management of low back pain: A systematic review

School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia

Received 16 January 2011; received in revised form 28 April 2011; accepted 9 May 2011. published online 06 June 2011.

Abstract 

Objective

To identify, appraise and determine the clinical readiness of diagnostic, prescriptive and prognostic Clinical Prediction Rules (CPRs) in the physiotherapy management of Low Back Pain (LBP).

Data sources

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from 1990 to January 2010 using sensitive search strategies for identifying CPR and LBP studies. Citation tracking and hand-searching of relevant journals were used as supplemental strategies.

Study selection

Two independent reviewers used a two-phase selection procedure to identify studies that explicitly aimed to develop one or more CPRs involving the physiotherapy management of LBP. Diagnostic, prescriptive and prognostic studies investigating CPRs at any stage of their development, derivation, validation, or impact-analysis, were considered for inclusion using a priori criteria. 7453 unique records were screened with 23 studies composing the final included sample.

Data extraction

Two reviewers independently extracted relevant data into evidence tables using a standardised instrument.

Data synthesis

Identified studies were qualitatively synthesized. No attempt was made to statistically pool the results of individual studies. The 23 scientifically admissible studies described the development of 25 unique CPRs, including 15 diagnostic, 7 prescriptive and 3 prognostic rules. The majority (65%) of studies described the initial derivation of one or more CPRs. No studies investigating the impact phase of rule development were identified.

Conclusions

The current body of evidence does not enable confident direct clinical application of any of the identified CPRs. Further validation studies utilizing appropriate research designs and rigorous methodology are required to determine the performance and generalizability of the derived CPRs to other patient populations, clinicians and clinical settings.

Keywords: Low back pain, Physical Therapy (Specialty), Decision making, Probability

Abbreviations: CPR, clinical prediction rule, LBP, low back pain, QUADCPR, quality checklist for prescriptive derivation-based clinical prediction rules

 

PII: S1356-689X(11)00074-9

doi:10.1016/j.math.2011.05.001

Manual Therapy
Volume 17, Issue 1 , Pages 9-21, February 2012