Journal Home
Search for

Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 404-407 (August 2010)


View previous. 14 of 15 View next.

Responsiveness, minimal importance difference and minimal detectable change scores of the shortened disability arm shoulder hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire

Kate Polson, Duncan ReidCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Peter J. McNair, Peter Larmer

Received 8 July 2009; received in revised form 4 March 2010; accepted 15 March 2010. published online 03 May 2010.

Abstract 

The aim of this study was to determine the responsiveness, Minimal Important Difference (MID) and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) scores of the shortened Disability Arm Shoulder Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire. Participants (n = 35) were recruited from private physiotherapy practices. Participants completed the QuickDASH questionnaire on two occasions; the first prior to treatment and the second at discharge or at six weeks post baseline, whichever event occurred first. The participants also completed a Global Change in Status Questionnaire (GSCQ). Responsiveness across treatment to discharge or at six weeks post initial visit was analysed by calculating the Effect Size (ES) and Standardised Response Mean (SRM). The MID was calculated using an anchor based approach and the MDC score was based upon calculations of the standard error of measurement (SEM). The results indicated that responsiveness was high (ES = 1.02, SRM = 1.1). The MID was 19 points while the MDC was 11 points.

These results provide evidence that the QuickDASH is a responsive instrument when utilised in patients seen in private practice over a typical treatment interval.

Health and Rehabilitation Research Centre, School of Rehabilitation and Occupation Studies, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006 Auckland 1020, New Zealand

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +64 (9) 917 9999x7806; fax: +64 (9) 917 9706.

PII: S1356-689X(10)00045-7

doi:10.1016/j.math.2010.03.008


View previous. 14 of 15 View next.