Manual Therapy
Volume 10, Issue 1 , Pages 68-72 , February 2005

Measurement of cervical range of motion pattern during cyclic neck movement by an ultrasound-based motion system

Received 22 November 2003 ,Revised 27 July 2004 ,Accepted 27 August 2004.

References 

  1. Bovim G, Schrader H, Sand T. Neck pain in the general population. Spine. 1994;19:1307–1309
  2. Capuano-Pucci D, Rheault W, Aukai J, Bracke M, Day R, Pastric M. Intratester and intertest reliability of the cervical range of motion device. Archive Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1991;72:338–340
  3. Castro WH, Sautmann A, Schilgen M, Sautmann M. Noninvasive three-dimensional analysis of cervical spine motion in normal subjects in relation to age and sex. An experimental examination. Spine. 2000;25:443–449
  4. Dvir Z, Prushansky T. Reproducibility and instrument validity of a new ultrasonography-based system for measuring cervical spine kinematics. Clinical Biomechanics. 2000;15:658–664
  5. Dvorak J, Antinnes JA, Panjabi M, Loustalot D, Bonomo M. Age and gender related normal motion of the cervical spine. Spine. 1992;17:S393–S398
  6. Fielding JW. Cineroeentgenography of the normal cervical spine. Journal of Bone Joint Surgery (Am). 1957;39:1280–1288
  7. Giez M, Hildingsson C, Stegmayr B, Toolanen G. Chronic neck pain of traumatic and non-traumatic origin (a population-based study). Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 2003;74:576–579
  8. Hagen KB, Harms-Ringdahl K, Enger NO, Hedenstad R, Morten H. Relationship between subjective neck disorders and cervical spine mobility and motion-related pain in male machine operators. Spine. 1997;22:1501–1507
  9. Mannion AF, Klein GN, Dvorak J, Lanz C. Range of global motion of the cervical spine (intraindividual reliability and the influence of measurement device). European Spine Journal. 2000;9:379–385
  10. Tousignant M, de Bellefeuille L, O’Donoughue Grahovac S. Criterion validity of cervical range of motion (CROM) goniometter for cervical flexion and extension. Spine. 2000;25:324–330
  11. Wang S-F, Chai H-M, Lu T-W. Comparison of ranges of cervical motion measured by gravity-based goniometry and ultrasound-based motion analysis system. Formosan Journal of Physical Therapy. 2002;27:124–130
  12. Wang S-F, Teng C-C, Chai H-M. Intra-rater reliability of measurement of cervical range of motion using an ultrasound-based motion analysis system. Formosan Journal of Physical Therapy. 2003;28:181–188
  13. Youdas JW, Garrett TR, Suman VJ, Bogard CL, Hallman HO, Carey JR. Normal range of motion of the cervical spine (an initial goniometric study). Physical Therapy. 1992;72:770–780

 The Human Ethic Committee of College of Medicine, National Taiwan University has approved the protocol of the study.

PII: S1356-689X(04)00084-0

doi: 10.1016/j.math.2004.08.009

Manual Therapy
Volume 10, Issue 1 , Pages 68-72 , February 2005